John Titus reports:
Janet Yellen, the current Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, believes the U.S. should do all it can to seize Russia’s 300 billion impounded $$ and give it to Ukraine. She says this action is “necessary and urgent”, and that there is certainly an “economic and moral case to move forward.” She is certain the courts will support her decision to seize property based on a belief and a decree. She is advocating doing things contrary to current laws, and letting the lawyers figure it out later. Meanwhile, the deed is done.
Titus recounts how the revolt of the noble class against King John resulted in The Magna Carta in 1215. You see, King John had gotten beholden to the moneylenders, who had financed his wars and shenanigans. He taxed all in his kingdom to pay his debts, which were inflated by all kinds of devious schemes, like usury. So now, the moneylenders begin to ask King John to issue a decrees allowing the seizure of someone’s personal property, like their farm, or business. The King’s Army would make the seizure, and people were separated from their property. “Larceny” was the legal term used back in the day. After that meeting in the meadow with King John, “larceny” became a crime. Men gained “rights”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy7LaCiK0j0
>>>>>
Martin Armstrong speaks of Executive Orders being Unconstitutional. The executive function of Federal and some of the State Governments is assuming duties assigned in their Constitutions to the legislative function of these bodies. (THIS is what Bobbie Anne Cox’s litigation in New York is about: legislators filed suit against the governor of the state of NY, contending that the executive function is seizing legislative power…. This is not constitutional.) Armstrong contends that if this abuse of power is not resolved by law, the Union will likely split into 3 new nations.
>>>>>
Here is another example of the executive seizing power from today’s Zero Hedge site: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sec-forced-halt-climate-reporting-mandate-businesses
25 state attorney generals have filed against the Federal Government, specifically, the SEC. The SEC made rules that businesses must disclose climate risk, mitigation, planning, footprint, etc. and the legal action is the push back. Will the rule of law prevail? Or will the public defenders from fraud be allowed to overstep their authority and seize more control?
“The SEC’s job is to protect people from fraud. It has no business slapping companies with extremist climate mandates. We are making it clear that Biden has to follow the law like everyone else,”
>>>>>
And in Oregon, small farms and market gardens are being shut down because of non-compliance with new regulations. This is being done by the State Government in the name of “water conservation and groundwater protection”. The State has claimed groundwater to be public property, and land tenants have no automatic right to the water beneath their land. They must apply for “water rights”. Here, the “rule of law” is being used to deprive a large number of independent farmers of their livelihood. Suddenly. Much property will be seized. This is a land grab by the Executive function of the State Government. Search this…. There are many articles about this, as it is happening right now. Litigation is pending.
If you’re going to have “rule of law” in your civilization, you also need to have sane laws and lawyers who lack evil intent. Laws have to make sense. And the procedure for drafting and approving laws needs reform. Multiple topics must not be covered in the same bill. Drafts must be circulated to all legislators well in advance of the vote. The welfare of the people in the community must take precedence over economic considerations.
https://twitter.com/KevinPinball/status/1773492750823960723
>>>>>
They say that just prior to a Communist takeover, the predators attack the food supply.
>>>>>
